This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Live-Archive
Science and Governance: the provocation of responsibility.
09/02
2008
2008
Conversation with Mariachiara Tallacchini On the Science in Society website of the European Commision one reads that “The European Commission needs to create the conditions for a structured dialogue on ... Science and Governance: the provocation of responsibility.
Science and Governance: the EU report on Science and Governance presented at FGB
01/02
2008
2008
The Giannino Bassetti Foundation deals with the problem of innovation and specifically with the responsibility that should guide innovative processes. Piero Bassetti defined innovation as the realisation of the improbable. ... Science and Governance: the EU report on Science and Governance presented at FGB
Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 3)
18/01
2008
2008
(…continues from the previous entry) Ubois: Do you see — I mean, another direction I could see this going is in the ways the lines between warfare and law enforcement ... Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 3)
Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 2)
15/01
2008
2008
(…continues from the previous entry) Ubois: It’s an interesting question of when should you essentially exit a field or exit certain social or power structures, because you can’t abide by ... Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 2)
Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 1)
12/01
2008
2008
Dr. Ronald Arkin is a Professor in the College of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and Director of the Mobile Robot Laboratory. In this discussion, he outlines the ... Dr. Ronald Arkin on Roboethics and Responsibility (part 1)
Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 5. Conclusion
29/12
2007
2007
We argued that the risks and challenges of digitally interoperable enterprise architectures that define the environment of contemporary organisations cannot be understood solely by looking at the traditional distinction between ... Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 5. Conclusion
Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 4. Putting it all together
30/11
2007
2007
The issues briefly sketched above lead us to discuss the risk and challenges for the creation digitally interoperable enterprise architecture between the public and the private sectors along three key ... Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 4. Putting it all together
Of flies and forests: putting laboratory work in its social context (part 2)
27/11
2007
2007
(…continues from the previous entry) CG That’s a very interesting context because usually, when we think about public understanding of science or media exposure of a scientific discovery, it’s always ... Of flies and forests: putting laboratory work in its social context (part 2)
Of flies and forests: putting laboratory work in its social context (part 1)
23/11
2007
2007
In this interview to Sophie Houdart taken at the Cerisy Cultural Centre in France in July 2006, we debated on the many links between the ethnography of science and the ... Of flies and forests: putting laboratory work in its social context (part 1)
Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 3. Federated, concentric and platform organisations
29/10
2007
2007
Building the internal capabilities, technical architecture, service delivery, planning and contract monitoring to achieve this ambition will require a governance framework encompassing a wide spectrum of arrangements, including the measurement ... Towards a new model of governance to manage new technologies in organizations – Part 3. Federated, concentric and platform organisations
Participatory design: an Interview with Dr. Michael Twidale (part 3)
26/10
2007
2007
(…continues from the previous entry) Ubois: So any other final thoughts on how to promote the concept of responsibility and innovation, you know, in public opinion and with practitioners? I’m ... Participatory design: an Interview with Dr. Michael Twidale (part 3)
Participatory design: an Interview with Dr. Michael Twidale (part 2)
19/10
2007
2007
(…continues from the previous entry) Ubois: At the Bassetti Foundation, we’ve been developing ideas about sustainability in innovation. What makes for sustainable innovation? What are things that would cause innovation ... Participatory design: an Interview with Dr. Michael Twidale (part 2)