Governance dell'innovazione scientifica e tecnologica: decisioni politiche [24/09/05]

( 23 Agosto 2005 )

( scritto da Gian Maria Borrello Cliccare sul link per scrivere all'autore )

Aggiornamento del 6 settembre 2005: Vai
Aggiornamento del 24 settembre 2005: Vai

Nel blog di Daniele Navarra, "Innovation, Risk and Governance", è stato affrontato di recente il tema del rapporto fra Politica e Scienza. Con i tre articoli intitolati...
- The democratic responsibility of scientific power
- On the governance of scientific innovation (part 1)
- On the governance of scientific innovation (part 2)
... Navarra accompagna il lettore in una riflessione che segue la prospettiva della gestione democratica del potere intercorrente fra tre poli ideal-tipici: quello della Politica, quello della Scienza e quello della Tecnologia.

Sui contenuti dei tre articoli, nel blog "Tout se tient" si trovano alcune mie annotazioni che preludono a un dialogo con Navarra.

Aggiornamento del 6 settembre 2005:

Aggiornamento del 24 settembre 2005:

L'argomento della governance dell'innovazione scientifica e tecnologica, con particolare riferimento alle decisioni politiche, al coinvolgimento in esse degli esperti scientifici e alla partecipazione del pubblico, trattato da Navarra appunto nei tre articoli, fa da sfondo a molti documenti pubblicati nel sito della Fondazione Bassetti. Inoltre, ci sono alcuni punti del sito che possono essere considerati come snodi dai quali raggiungere i testi sul tema. Suggerisco di vedere le seguenti voci degli Indici degli argomenti:

[*] In indice Agosto 2003 - Agosto 2004
[**] In indice Agosto 2002 - Agosto 2003

... nonché...

[*] Si raggiunge dall'indice Agosto 2002 - Agosto 2003 cliccando su "Innovazione, rischio sociale e responsabilità politica"
[**] Si raggiunge dall'indice Luglio 2000 - Agosto 2002 cliccando su "Scienza, politica e società (nel Percorso 'Authority e libertà della ricerca')"
[***] Si raggiunge dall'indice Luglio 2000 - Agosto 2002 cliccando su "Scienza, politica e società (nel Percorso 'Jacques Testart e il Principio di precauzione')"

I testi indicati qui di seguito sono un'utile integrazione alla lettura dei tre articoli di Navarra e delle mie annotazioni.

Numerose Rassegne stampa pubblicate in questo sito, a cura di Vittorio Bertolini, forniscono molteplici spunti critici sul tema della governance dell'innovazione scientifica e tecnologica, con particolare riferimento all'aspetto della partecipazione degli esperti scientifici alle decisioni politiche. Le indico nel post seguente.

Backright-up.gif (913 byte)

 

 

The evolution of the Blog 'Innovation, Risk and Governance'

( 31 Gennaio 2005 )

( scritto da Daniele Navarra Cliccare sul link per scrivere all'autore )

This essay is a round up of the themes and issues developed in the blog 'Innovation, Risk and Governance' over the past few months. It is a collection of quotes from the various posts creating the established and emergent areas of interest for the development of the ongoing discussion. For each of the aspects mentioned below, we point to the attention of the readers a series of quotes and related links which constitute what is considered as being the 'backbone' of the blog.

The quotes have been categorised following the emergent set of issues that are to be developed from now on, and in particular:

1) The innovations brought about by the information economy and society and related changes in enterprise patterns, organisation and development.

2) Issues of governance of innovation and associated risks in the area of international development, business standards and regulation.

3) The model of reference of the guiding principles actualising the transition to a globalised, multinational society and the role of technology as mobile knowledge.

Proceeding in order, therefore we would like to point ou the following about each one of the issues above.

1) The innovations brought about by the information economy and society and related changes in enterprise patterns, organisation and development.

'What is now widely known as the 'Information Society', based on the capillary diffusion of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), is a major influence to the changing social and economic circumstances of today's business and organisational realities. [.] Not only for the impact that their intertwined effects are likely to have on the performance of business firms, and consequently in supporting sustained economic growth, but also to benefit from the continuous drive for innovation that a better educated population can make reality in all areas of social organisation.' From: Innovation, Industry and the Role of Researchers in Italy

'Even if we cannot affirm that ICTs have been neglected by the literature on industrial innovation, it is perceived that in such literature not enough attention was given to the relationships between innovation and the information society. That is also because the methodology of these studies tends to offer a general theory on innovation whose evolution is somehow separated from history.' [.] 'Thus, in such society the dimension of responsibility is essential, and 'governing the innovation' becomes imperative.' From: ICTs, Governance and Development: understanding risks and challenges

2) Issues of governance of innovation and associated risks in the area of international development, business standards and regulation.

'Innovation is considered an essential characteristic for progress understood as social and economic development.'

'Innovations, irrespective of their source or domain, can have two effects in the contexts where they take place. One is advancing progress and the social good, say by formulating better or new processes, structures and/or syntheses which can improve living conditions of human beings and their quality of life. The other can be harm, destruction and agony. Examples of the former include advances in water management systems, coordination processes which reduce leakage of resources away from non productive uses and many applications of information technology and computing in science which, among other things, have led to the mapping of the human genome. The latter would comprise the atomic bomb, or as Francis Fukuyama and Piero Bassetti have pointed out, terrorists transforming civil airplanes into rockets.'

'Whereas in the past the main focus was on product specific and/or other 'physical' innovations, the novelty is that innovations related to intellectual property, software and services have become the most debated and controversial themes for countries adopting, implementing or renewing their legislation in relation to intellectual property and trade in services. ' From: Conceptualising Innovation: A theoretical and practical agenda

'Innovations carry with themselves an implicit or explicit element of risk. Since not only the consequences of applying new methods of thinking and doing is not predictable, thus generating risks and side effects, but also the way in which the innovation will spread, diffuse and be used is not controllable even when risk management techniques are used. Following Claudio Ciborra's extensive study 'From Control to Drift' and the forthcoming evaluation of risk in the creation of large scale information infrastructures, he explains that attempts to control risks or their occurrence generate in turn new risks and challenges that can ramify into outcomes which were neither originally thought of, nor predictable in the first place.' From: Conceptualising Risk: A theoretical and practical agenda

'I have been concerned about governance of international business standards. Here are my thoughts: The article raised issues that will become increasingly significant in defining international commerce and related exchanges. I would dichotomize the issues into human disasters and financial disasters. The human tragedies are those related to life while the financials disasters are those that do not involve life but rather financial plundering, misrepresentation or other criminal activities. I believe that both of these "disasters" will require international governance standards.' From: On the Governance of International Business Standards, a letter by Sunil Bedi

'The question of governance then takes a new shape in relation to jointly owned initiatives. It is not any longer about a dynamic rivalry between the two types (and until recently antithetic forms of governing and organising resources and activities) is not any longer a matter of appartenance to one or the other 'front' since, at in least in terms of governance, there are many growing similarities, or at least a convergence. In nuce this is about the 'commercialisation' of government and the 'social responsibilisation' of firms.' From: Conceptualising Governance: A theoretical and practical agenda

3) The model of reference of the guiding principles actualising the transition to a globalised, multinational society and the role of technology as mobile knowledge.

'The context we refer to for the term governance is necessarily global. Governance is generally understood as a broad process affecting the collective decision-making roles and procedures, management and authority relationships amongst social and economic agents involving multiple jurisdictions and domains. In each of these, there is a divergence of opinion, knowledge and information which limit the options available to each party to reach the optimal (decision, investment, choice, strategy, .) and therefore second best procedures (or contracts) are used to reach agreement. Governance is about governing and therefore cannot be isolated from the notion of political responsibility in all areas in which delegated authority performs decision-making.' From: Conceptualising Governance: A theoretical and practical agenda

The challenges that these technologies pose are wide ranging and need to be addressed in consideration of at least the following elements:

- the decision-making structure in relation to the development, introduction and diffusion of these technologies on a large scale;
- the governance arrangements between the partners involved in their production, utilisation and delivery; and
- the communication of the responsibility for sharing risks and side-effects in case things go wrong.

'The lack of specific regulatory guidelines or disclosure obligations combined with the absence of standards is what furtherance the difficulty of dealing with the unsettling uncertainties that such innovation produces. Biotechnologies are also posing similar challenges, and although their promises are fascinating to address issues of famine and undernutrition in developing countries there is still great uncertainty in relation to their pharmacological, nutritional and quality benefits.' From: Bio- & Nano-Technology: who should decide and who will pay?


In conclusion, the relationship between the information society and innovation needs to be looked at in relation to the dynamic elements of such society within established structures and agencies of the economy. Networked communication as much as bio- and nano-technologies are a characteristic of such society. In particular for their convergence towards a pattern of co-evolving ecosystems, blurring to a certain extent the definitions of the separated areas in which these innovations evolve and take place over time. New patterns of risk are also emerging as a result, and the processes and structures of these innovations are global, not only for the reality of their interconnectedness, but also for the feeling that such risks generate on an otherwise unrelated congregation of individuals and organisations. Greater democratic participation in the process of cooperation to reach societal objectives over the long term could be desirable. As Piero Bassetti has highlighted in his lecture at the London School of Economics [*]: 'research and discovery are not the same thing as innovation. A discovery becomes innovation only when the increase in "knowledge" implicit in every discovery becomes technology and actuating power (that is, social capital) that the discovery implements'.

[*] Please click here to see the full text of Piero Bassetti's lecture at the London School of Economics

Backright-up.gif (913 byte)

 

 

Latest updates in the blog 'Innovation, Risk and Governance'

( 25 Ottobre 2004 )

( scritto da Daniele Navarra Cliccare sul link per scrivere all'autore )

I have posted the last of a triad of 'guideline' entries for readers and potential contributors in my blog 'Innovation, Risk & Governance'.

The first post on 'Conceptualising Innovation: A theoretical and practical agenda' delineates the theoretical guidelines, perceived as being also of interest to practitioners, about Innovation, which is understood as social and economic development of nations.

The model of reference are those states which in the course of history have been able to support the autonomous development of firms and national innovation systems. For instance by creating the appropriate conditions for the creation and establishment of links between research institutes, the private sector, industry and banking institutions enabling a formative context in favour of creativity and experimentation. And in that way supporting a virtuous cycle of 'creative destruction' with high innovation capacity, which facilitates the creation of a dynamic and productive industrial sector.

The second entry on 'Conceptualising Risk: A theoretical and practical agenda' which suggests a definition for the concept of Risk.

Conceptually the notion of risk includes probabilistic calculations and the creation of models to manipulate reality and predict the future. However, starting from the ground that we live in the 'Risk Society' (as defined by Ulrich Beck) these models are at best incomplete, because it is impossible to provide insurance in the occurrence of risks which affect simultaneously a large number of people, as in the case of natural disasters. Therefore the concept or risk, as well as its management, needs to be complemented by an understanding of the social and political dynamics at work while the relationships of productive assets change as we move towards modernity. Such a move involves in part the re-alignment of the rules of wealth production and distribution of consequently the occurrence of new risks and challenges.

Finally the third and last entry is about Governance, 'Conceptualising Governance: A theoretical and Practical Agenda'

Governance is the key element to build an understanding of the major events which characterise the modern world, composed of global networks. It implies the understanding of the re-definition of the role of governments and international organisations, as well as of international law and politics. In this context Information and Communication Technologies emerge as a major component of such new world. Since ICTs are the actualising instrument of the formation of new identities and loyalties globally, their regulation will be a fundamental theme of the current decade. From that follows a movement which requires the redefinition of the notion of political responsibility, which is increasingly mediated from the emerging networks of individuals, nations and organisations which compose the constellation of the fragmented geo-political panorama of the 21st century.

The ideas presented above are not to be considered by all means complete. Anyone can participate to the ongoing discussion hosted in my blog by writing at . Or by inserting their comments in the space provided in my blog.

Backright-up.gif (913 byte)

 

 

Aggiornamento del Blog: 'Innovation, Risk & Governance' (per il pubblico Italiano)

( 12 Ottobre 2004 )

( scritto da Daniele Navarra Cliccare sul link per scrivere all'autore )

Ho inserito nel Blog 'Innovation, Risk & Governance' l'ultimo post di 'orientamento' per lettori del sito ed eventuali collaboratori della FGB. La "triade" di post che definisco di 'orientamento' ha trattato di volta in volta i punti chiave degli argomenti del Blog, sia come modello di riferimento che come spunto di discussione con i lettori. L'idea di fondo di questi post e' quella di fondare le basi per continuare in maniera proficua la vasta rassegna di argomenti trattati nel Blog.

Il primo pezzo ('Conceptualising Innovation: A theoretical and practical agenda') traccia le linee teoriche con ripercussione anche per i 'practioners' nel campo dell'Innovazione, intesa come sviluppo economico e sociale delle nazioni.

I modelli di riferimento sono quegli stati che lungo il corso della storia sono riusciti a supportare aziende e sistemi di innovazione in grado di svilupparsi autonomamente. In particolare attraverso la creazione di legami tra gli istituti di ricerca, il settore privato, l'industria in senso largo e le istituzioni bancarie creando un contesto formativo a favore della creativita' e della sperimentazione, ma che allo stesso tempo ha indirizzato risorse non solo per la ricerca, ma anche per lo sviluppo e l'applicazione delle stesse. Supportando in tal modo un circolo virtuoso di 'distruzione creativa' ad alta capacita' innovativa in grado di beneficiare il sistema economico attraverso la creazione di un tessuto industriale dinamico e produttivo.

Il secondo pezzo ('Conceptualising Risk: A theoretical and practical agenda') riguarda la definizione del concetto di Rischio.

Il concetto di rischio include il calcolo probabilistico e la creazione di modelli in grado di prevenire e manipolare la realta'. Tali modelli risultano incompleti nella societa' attuale, ovvero, secondo Beck, la 'Societa' del Rischio'. L'incompletezza del solo aspetto di gestione quantitativa risulta dall'impossibilita' delle compagnie di assicurazione di essere in grado di risarcire piu' persone simulaneamente a causa del manifestarsi di rischi quali catastrofi naturali. Pertanto il concetto di rischio e la gestione dello stesso deve essere necessariamente supportato dalla comprensione delle dinamiche politiche e sociali in gioco durante il cambiamento delle relazioni degli assetti produttivi e l'alterazione dello status quo. Partendo da una rassegna dei contributi di autori del calibro di Anthony Giddens e Ulrich Beck, il concetto di rischio si materializza innanzi tutto sotto le sembianze del passaggio epocale tra tradizone e modernita'. Tale passaggio comporta da una parte lo sconvolgimento delle regole di organizzazione e produzione della ricchezza dell'epoca pre-moderna e di conseguenza produce nuovi rischi durante la fase transitoria verso la modernita'.

Infine, il terzo ed ultimo pezzo e' sulla Governance ('Conceptualising Governance: A theoretical and Practical Agenda').

La Governance e' la chiave di lettura principale degli eventi che caratterrizzano il nuovo mondo composto di reti globali. Un tema 'caldo' che implica la ridefinizione del ruolo dei governi e delle organizzazioni internazionali del diritto e della politica internazionale. In tale contesto emergono le nuove tecnologie dell'informazione e della comunicazione. Dal momento che queste tecnologie sono lo strumento di attuazione del formarsi di nuove identita' e nuove fedelta' a livello globale la loro regolamentazione sara' un tema fondamentale del decennio attuale. Ne consegue pertanto il crearsi di un movimento che necessita la ridefinizione della responsabilita' politica meditata dalle emergenti reti di individui, nazioni ed organizzazioni che compongono la costellazione del frastagliato panorama geo-politco all'inizio del 21esimo secolo.

Le riflessioni riportate sopra sono da considerarsi per nulla complete, tutt'altro. Passo quindi la parola ai lettori per commenti o idee sugli elementi mancanti nel mosaico abbozzato con i post di orientamento per rendere il mio spazio piu' utile e interessante. Grazie per la cortese attenzione. Potete scrivermi le vostre idee, opinioni o commenti a: , oppure usando il modulo per i commenti che si trova in calce all'ultimo dei post di 'orientamento'.

Backright-up.gif (913 byte)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Argomento:
Innovation, Risk and Governance
(Indice da Settembre 2004 ad Agosto 2005)